Home
2006 Polk Co. Data
2006 State Data
The Boatrights
Input
Polk DOE Audit
ADHD & ESE
Polk ESE Issues
Districts in Court
In Court 4 Drew
The Details
IEP Tips
Links
About Us

 

 

ESE Issues Polk County Needs to Address

For several years I had participated as a member of the ESE Advisory Committee for Polk County Schools.  In 2002 I researched as best I could to discover what issues needed to be addressed in Polk County to improve its ESE program. 

bullet

I prepared an ESE Issues paper and submitted it to the County’s ESE Advisory Council in October, 2002, to no avail. 

bullet

I then took the issues to School Superintendent Jim Thornhill on November 18th, 2002, who said the issues would be used as a basis to review the ESE Department.

bullet

In late January, 2003, I contacted the administration to ask if the ESE Department had been reviewed.  Shortly thereafter, Sherwin Holmes called to say he was putting together some information for me, and would respond in the next few weeks.

bullet

On March 3, 2003, Sherwin Holmes responded via email to the issues I had presented to the ESE Advisory Committee that was no longer meeting.  Director Holmes' March 3rd response has been inserted within the Issues Paper that you will find below.  The information Sherwin provided was helpful, but far from complete.  The Issue Paper had no apparent impact other than it shut down the ESE Advisory Committee meetings.

bullet

I then presented the issues paper personally to three of the school board members, with little apparent impact. 

bullet

I mailed the issues to all of the School Board Members, and did get a concerned response from one of the board members. 

In the 2003-2004 school year, there were three ESE Advisory Committee meetings.  The first meeting was abbreviated and ineffective.  The last two were informative on the topics covered, but the content of the meetings were closely controlled.  I believe the control of the committee by the ESE administration greatly limited identifying the scope of the challenges faced by the district and greatly limited any advisory role the committee could perform.

I now believe that the biggest impact my Issues Paper had was to initiate an effort by one or more officials of the Polk County School District to exit my son Drew from the school system as quickly as possible. 

I have come to the realization that it is not in the best interest of the Polk County School System officials or the Florida Department of Education officials to identify the issues that need to be addressed to correct the deficiencies.  There is political will in the state to keep Florida a "low tax" state.  There is not that same political will to allocate the necessary resources to meet the federal mandate of IDEA which assures special needs children the education and special services they need.  

My interest in having the committee taking an active role to improve the ESE program has not diminished.    I am in hopes this information will generate interest in the committee from other ESE parents and ESE educators who are willing to work to educate the voters and our political representatives to help to change the political will to benefit special needs children. 

I would like to find out if other ESE parents or ESE staff have information to share on these issues.  If you disagree with concerns expressed in the Issues Paper, just email me.  I can learn.

Immediately below is an index of the Issues Paper. Click on the links below for specific information regarding a particular issue.  Or just scroll down and read the text of the 2002 Issues Paper in it's entirety.   Within the paper I have inserted ESE Director Holmes' 2003 reply.  His reply is underlined and in red. 

 

Contents of Issues Paper:

1.  A State of Exceptional Student Education in Polk County
 

2.  Communicating with Parents
 

3.  The ESE Budget
 

4.  Varying Exceptionalities
 

5.  Permanent Substitutes
 

6.  Behavior Therapists
 

7.  An Arrest Protocol
 

8.  ESE Dropout Rate
 

9.  Nine Open Positions for Speech Teachers
 

10.  Lack of Advanced Degrees

 

11.  FTE Class Sizes
 

12.  Number of Unfilled ESE Positions
 

13.  Substitutes for Para's
 

14.  In-School and Out-of-School Suspension Rate
 

15.  Incidents of Battery
 

16.  Year Delay in Providing Services
 

17.  Training of Para's
 

18.  Vocational Training
 

19.  Instruction of Regular Ed Teachers on Inclusion
 

20.  Parent Involvement

 

 

ISSUES  PAPER

Date :  November 18, 2002

To:      Mr. Jim Thornhill, School Superintendent

From:  Bill Sammons [sammons@tampabay.rr.com]

           (863) 688-3323

            An ESE Parent

I was glad to receive notification of the ESE Advisory Committee Meeting.  Below are topics that I presented to Don Woods, the committee chairman.  I would like to see the committee discuss many of these topics during the course of the year.  It is a long list and some of the topics are involved. 

First, I should probably ask if you believe this committee is the appropriate forum for these issues. If so, could the committee prioritize these issues for discussion, as well as other issues you and the other committee members have?  If this committee is not the appropriate forum, it would be great if the committee could discuss where these issues should be addressed.

Often a few wonderful programs are discussed in the meetings, and it is great to hear about them, they are important, and we should continue to discuss them.  But it is also important that we fully address those problematic topics and issues that could have the greatest impact on the ESE students and ESE teachers in Polk County.  Viable solutions that answer these issues as well as the wonderful programs should be identified and actively advocated by the committee.

Below are some of the more problematic topics and issues that could be covered in this year’s meetings.  Several of the issues below may not have a substantial foundation.  The members of this committee could help to correct any information and/or any interpretation that is concurrent.  Where the concerns expressed do have foundation, the committee could seek to find solutions.

[ ESE Director Sherwin Holmes' March, 2003, response to issues inserted in red ]. 

Bill,

Below are some answers for you as we discussed.  The best way to cover this much material is to sit down and discuss it.

1. A State of Exceptional Student Education in Polk County Program

I would be interested in hearing an overview of the ESE programs from the Director of Exceptional Student Education.  What does the Director of ESE Services see as the current strengths and weaknesses of Exceptional Student Education in Polk County:

Some of the strengths would include the collaboration with regular education in the areas reading initiatives including our Reading 1st partnerships and Reading Matters trainings.  Inclusion is another area that Polk progressed in.

Weaknesses include the training issues for both paraprofessionals and teachers.  The dilemma of training during the school day and covering with substitutes vs. after school training that cannot be mandated under our current collective bargaining agreement.  Teacher certification is another issue for the District and will need to be addressed under our No Child Left Behind Committee.  Suspension rates continue to be an on going concern. 

What are the initiatives he is planning to build on those strengths and to correct those weaknesses?  

 What are the Director’s issues? 

Where would parent support be most helpful to the program?

Parents of ESE students and regular education students can have the strongest impact at the school level in PTO and SAC committees.  The ESE advisory is meant to supplement the school level efforts.  Other committees that deal with specific ESE issues such as SEDNET offer more focused opportunities for parent involvement.

For instance, the overview for the ESE programs for autistic children could include:

(1) How may autistic children are in the district? 

(2)  What is the largest class size, the smallest class size, the typical class size within the district? 

(3)  What is the typical disability-specific training of the teachers and the para-professionals that work with autistic children? 

(4)  How many of the teachers are teaching out-of-field?

In the ESE department according to the data from SAP the number of teachers   teaching out of field are 214.

(5) What is the policy on providing para’s?

The ESE portion of the 2002-03 Polk County Staffing Plan states that paraprofessionals are designated for self-contained classes and should be used in this capacity. It also states that if a unit meets appeal criteria assistance may be provided as either a part-time or full-time paraprofessional that would include the self-contained or resource classes.  Under extreme health and behavioral circumstances it may be necessary to assign a specific paraprofessional to a student or group of students.  The assignment of a paraprofessional is a restrictive measure and limits the student’s contact with peers affecting socialization.

 (6) What is the general curriculum followed?

The curriculum of each of our units follows the Sunshine State Standards and the Sunshine State Standards for Children with Disabilities. This is provided by the state as benchmarks for facilitation of learning.

 

2.  COMMUNICATING WITH PARENTS:

Parent involvement is generally acknowledged as a good thing, it’s just how does one get it? 

Can a serious effort be made to develop a voluntary email directory and/or mailing directory of parents and teachers, grouped by disability? 

Some ESE parents are on an email list.  This list has been generated at conferences, parent newsletter, and the FDLRS newsletter.  At the conferences, parents all asked to fill out their email address if they so choose.  In the parent newsletter and the FDLRS newsletter parents are asked if they would like to become a member of an email directory and if so to complete the form and return to FDLRS.  We must be very cautious with sharing parents’ email because of confidentiality and the fact that many of them do not want to release their email.  This is true also in regard to their students’ disability of which many of our parents do not want to reveal.

Could parents be notified of issues that would be coming before the school board that would have a direct impact on their child?

 Notification of school board issues is available though the public relations department of the Polk County School District.  Leah Lauderdale is our public relations director and is knowledgeable in this particular area.

Could we notify them of new services that may be available or upcoming training?

ESE parents are notified of new services and upcoming training through the parents’ newsletter, the FDLRS newsletter as well as announcements in the local newspaper. Coming events are also sent through the email system to the schools for posting or provided as handouts for the students to take home.  Many times various businesses throughout Polk County will place in their businesses, posters notifying the community of coming events.

 

3. THE ESE BUDGET:

What dollars come into the county specifically for ESE?   How much money is there and what are the major sources?

The ESE department received varies sources of funding for students ranging from the local funds to multiple grant funds.  These funds vary from year to year.  This year we received the following amounts.

1.      Local funds $107,737,254.00

These funds are allocated for salaries, instructional text materials, technology, contracted services and extended learning plan.

2.      Federal funds          $11,360,367.00

(IDEA, SEDNET, Alternate Assessment)

These funds are allocated for enhancement of programs to include instructional materials, equipment, technology, contracted services, support personnel salaries, student specific paraprofessional  salaries, teacher training, paraprofessional training and parent training.

 

Where are these dollars spent?  Is ESE spending 80 percent of its budget on staff? 

ESE is spending approximately 83% of its budget on salaries. 

How much is going to outside service providers? 

Approximately $1,300,000.00 is allocated for outside services providers (i.e. speech, mental health, health care)

Is a detailed discussion the how the ESE budget works a reasonable topic for the ESE Advisory Committee to be conversant with?

 

4.  VARYING EXCEPTIONALITIES:

In the Florida Comprehensive System of Personnel Development Personnel Data Planning Book, 2000-2001, it reports that 65% (586) of Polk’s 902 ESE teachers were teaching Varying Exceptionalities classes.  Of the 13 largest school systems in the state, only Volusia County had a higher percentage.  Of the 13 largest school systems that I compared which serve 70 percent of Florida’s students, Volusia at 82% had the highest percentage of VE teachers, Polk was second at 65%, with the remaining 11 counties percentages reported at 37%, 36.5%, 35.3%, 30.3%, 16.8%, 15.7%, 7.5%, 5.9%, 2.0%, 1.9%, and 1.1%. I understand large numbers of VE classes could mean there is a high rate of inclusion present in a school system.  I have been assured in Polk County it does not.

As of July 1 of 2002 the state of Florida has collapsed the specific exceptionality certification and now certifies ESE teachers as ESE k-12.  The Districts and colleges are going through a transition period to accommodate the new certification law that has been enacted by the state.  Teachers in the District that were hired prior to the new law are certified according to their specific exceptionality but are recorded on SAP as VE.

There are several good reasons what the high percentage of Varying Exceptionalities teachers should receive attention as a major issue.  (1) Two highly-decorated ESE teachers have told me they would not teach VE classes in Polk.  When asked why, the teachers said (2) the VE teachers generally had too many kids in the VE classes, and (3) there with too many diverse disabilities, making it impossible for the teacher to deliver an effective education.  When checking further, there are class sizes approaching and in some instances exceeding 40 children, (4) with no aide present being the general rule.  I have had heard arguments by an administrator that the high numbers could be justified to some degree because generally VE is a transitory classroom, with many of the students attending other classes or receiving other services outside the classroom during much of the day.  The VE class I happened to stop by had 42 students enrolled, with 22 students actually in the classroom during my brief visit.  Two more students were being added to the class that afternoon.  There was an aide working in the classroom with the teacher, but the principal reported that the aide was supposed to be elsewhere on campus, but she tried to send the aide into the VE class whenever possible because of the impossible position the VE teacher was placed in.  When I asked the teacher about the class, she asked (5) how would I like keeping up with 45 IEP’s?  And then I remembered the (6) high mobility of Polk’s students.  We were probably talking about 55 or 60 IEP’s during the year.

Many of the VE classes are resource, which means that the students are only in the ESE classroom for a specific time period each day. With reference to the high numbers of students in the VE classroom, once again this is clarified in the Staffing Plan 2002-03 for the Polk School District. If a VE resource room has weighted weekly contact hours over 835 or the units have more than 30 students with 650 weighted hours the principal of the school may appeal for assistance.  Assistance may be provided as either part-time or full-time paraprofessional help or another teaching unit.  Scheduling by the individual school determines the number of ESE students in the ESE classroom at any given period.

This description of the Polk County VE classroom seems to be confirmed when reviewing the data in the Personnel Data Planning Book.   Of the 585 VE teachers employed by Polk County, 39.8% (233) of them were teaching Out-of-Field, which was 88.9% of all of the Out-of-Field ESE teachers employed by Polk.  Are knowledgeable ESE teachers steering clear of VE classes with the void being filled by Out-of-Field teachers? 

Information at http://cpt.fsu.edu/tree/VE/BEES6.HTML on Best Practices in Providing Educational Services in a VE Delivery Model seems to reinforce that the ESE Advisory Committee should discuss the VE classrooms in Polk County.

 

5. Permanent Substitutes:

It would be fair to say that many parents would be shocked if they heard that several ESE classes had substitute teachers the entire year.  Should we know how many ESE classrooms had substitutes the entire year  and what exceptionalities were involved?

There are approximately 710 ESE teachers.  Out of the 710, 16 ESE VE teachers are provisional substitutes or permanent substitutes.

 

6. Behavior Therapists:

The need for behavior therapists is a topic near to my heart due to first hand experience.  For some years Sherwin Holmes has been trying to get the School Board to hire 5 additional behavioral therapists, one for each district.  It is my understanding that last year two positions were finally approved, but they went unfilled.  Is it still the case?  What can be done to fill them?  Was the salary offered one realistic to meet with success?

 The county currently uses a total of 5 Behavior Analysts. Two Behavior Analysts are on staff and 3 are private contractors. These providers work with educators and students in developing behavior plans and staff training. 

One of the reasons behavioral therapists are needed is to stem the criminalization of kids with developmental disabilities by their arrest after their teachers or school resource officers have filed criminal charges against them.  Intensive training of the teacher, the school resource officer, and the student by behavioral therapists would appear to promise to greatly reduce the arrest rate.  Has the ESE Department quantified how often charges are being filed against ESE students?  Do we know the arrest rate?    

At the present time the ESE Department does not have access to the number of ESE students that have had charges filed against them while on school grounds. A present initiate of the Network for Children with Severe Emotional Disturbance (SEDNET) is to review the arrest rate and out of school suspensions for Polk ESE students.  The purpose of the review is to identify gaps in services for students and plans for implementation for appropriate strategies.

 

7. An Arrest Protocol:

This is another topic taken from personal experience.  Whenever a teacher, administrator, or school resource officer files incident reports with law enforcement agencies pertaining to ESE students, and where the behavior is a manifestation of the disability, should a protocol be developed to insure:  (1) parents are contacted;

School districts may summon law enforcement authorities in response to any criminal activity that involves an IDEA-eligible student.  20 USC 1415(f)(9)(A) and 34 CFR 300.329(a).  “The implication of this legislation is that a district does not have to notify the parents or otherwise comply with the IDEA’s procedural safeguards prior to reporting a crime.”  A school district can call the police when a student’s misconduct is a manifestation of his disability.  Although a school district is not allowed to impose serious discipline sanctions in response to a conduct that is a manifestation of a student’s disability, calling the police is not considered a disciplinary measure under IDEA. 

and (2) intervention IEP’s are conducted if indicated; and (3) arrest reports and school reports are made known and available to the student’s parents; and (4) a documented review to determine if behavior plans were in-place and if they were being properly executed; and (5) is the teacher or administrator filing the charges satisfied that lack of training or lack of support was or was not a significant factor in the filing of charges; and  (6) if direct therapy by a behavior analyst or a behavior therapist is required to avoid future outbursts; and (7) if behavior training should be made available to parents to keep a consistent behavior plan at home and at school; and (8) and interview of the teacher or administrator to identify any other intervention or training the could avoid future incidents and/or arrests of the student. 

The arrest procedures involving ESE students will be discussed by the SEDNET committee as they review the systems issues relating to criminal charges and discipline for ESE students. Parental input is encouraged.

 

 8.  The DOE Audit of Polk’s High ESE Dropout Rate

For the first time ever, last year the DOE decided not to audit ESE departments randomly, but to audit those districts with indicators pointing to possible crises.  Polk was one of the first six to be audited under the new program.  Polk’s crisis indicator was the dropout rate of it’s ESE students.  The County has, or should be receiving a final copy of this audit soon.  Should this be a topic discussed by the ESE Advisory Committee? 

To clarify, DOE does still have 3 types of audits: random program audits, focused and continuous audits.

The trigger for the monitoring visit was the dropout rate for students with disabilities.  The information transmitted to DOE showed unusually high dropout rates.  Part of the discrepancy is due to clerical entry procedures that have been corrected and will show significant decreases for the current school year. 

During the week of March 18th, 2002, Polk County participated in a focused monitoring visit.  The report from the Department of Education was received November 6, 2002.  Our department in cooperation with other departments in the school system wrote a response and corrective action plan.  This corrective action plan has been received and approved by the DOE.  It is a 2-year plan involving staff training, attendance policies and tracking, placement decisions, implementation of positive discipline plans, and the expansion of vocational opportunities for ESE students. 

Click here to get a copy of Department of Education's 2004 Polk Profile and go to page 4 "Dropout Rate" section.  Statewide, 4% of ESE students drop out verses 6% in Polk.

 

9. Nine Open Positions for Speech teachers: 

Is there a triage process to determine which students get the speech services that are available?  For some students, timely speech therapy is much more critical than for others.  Are parents whose ESE children are not getting speech notified so they may have an opportunity to mitigate the lack of therapy available from the school system?  Are contract services available for those students not receiving services but to whom the services are critical?  Does Polk County have high vacancies because of unreasonable case loads?  Is there a vicious cycle underway? 

Referral Process – The referral for speech-language services involves the same steps as any other ESE program, including 2 IAT meetings and interventions. In addition, we have implemented the use of a Communication Screening instrument that helps the school staff and speech-language pathologist develop the appropriate interventions prior to placement decisions.

Students Not Receiving Services – At this time, all students with current IEPs are receiving services due to a highly dedicated staff who have taken on additional job responsibilities to make sure this has happened. The district is currently contracting 5 speech-language positions.

Open Positions – We are exploring a salary restructuring proposal for speech-language pathologists. We have also met and discussed our critical shortage with David Lauer, Liz Miles, Bob Hartley, Rocky Yearwood. 

Go to the 2004 Data Indicators tab, click, and look at page 8.  Statewide, 14% of the total disabled population is identified as Speech Impaired (SI) as compared with 8% in Polk County.  These numbers are saying that Polk may have 75% more Speech Impaired students  than it has identified.

10.  Lack of Advanced Degrees:

According to the Florida School Indicators Report on http://MyFloridaEducation.Com , 28.5 percent of Polk County’s high school teachers have advanced degrees.  Statewide, 39.7 percent of high school teachers have advanced degrees.  Of Florida’s 67 school districts, there are only 11 districts with a lower percentage of advanced degrees, but they are districts with very small student populations. Clay County is at the 27.8 percent mark, and has a student population of approximately 28,000.  The other ten counties that have lower percentages have populations of 7,500 or less.

ESE programs I would guess rely more on teachers with advanced degrees than Regular Ed programs.  We need to discuss strategies to bring this number up.

Degrees are within the scope of the No Child Left Behind Act and are being addressed through a combined effort of Instructional Services and Human Resource Development.

 

11. FTE Class sizes:

Could the FTE class sizes be made available for everyone on the ESE Advisory Committee to review?

What are the average classroom sizes by exceptionality.  What are the largest classes, and what are the smallest classes in each exceptionality?  How many of the classes are too large according to best practices?  For VE classes, what is the typical class size during the day.

Florida statutes delegate ESE class size decisions to Districts that are subject to funding constraints.  While there are no best practices, class sizes are inversely proportional to state funding allocations.

The Polk County Schools Staffing Plan 2002-2003 that is updated each year states class sizes for regular education as well as for ESE classes.  The size of the class or units are allocated by assessing the number of student’s weekly contact hours and individual program weightings.  The weighted weekly contact hours for a resource classroom should fall within the range of 550-835 with 650 being the point at which the FEFP dollars support the cost of the unit.  Self-contained units serving students who do not participate in the regular education program are program staffed. The following are the broad guidelines for the class size:

Exceptionally                 # of Students

Mild (EMH, EH, SLD, VE)             13

Moderate (TMH)                        11

Severe (Autistic, SED, Profound)   8

Physically Impaired                     8

Pre-kindergarten                        12

 

 12. The Number of Unfilled ESE Position.  Were the DOE’s Numbers Right? 

In the Florida Comprehensive System of Personnel Development Personnel Data Planning Book, 2000-2001, it reports the Polk County School District had only 6 vacancies in the 2000-2001 school year.  Was that right?  What is the current number of unfilled ESE teaching positions, service positions, and para-professional positions?

Our Personnel Department was unable to verify this information.  Advertised vacancies are listed on the PCSB website at: 

http://www.polk-fl.net/

Please note that the website may not reflect the most current information.

 

13. Substitutes for Para’s:

Polk County as a very low absentee rate for it’s teaching staff.  What is the absentee rate for Polk’s ESE para-professionals?  From experience, when a para-professional is absent, generally a substitute for the para-professional is not provided.  In ESE education, it appears the instructional model depends on the para if instruction is going to be effective that day in the classroom.  Do ESE administrators agree with this and are there any plans to generally provided substitutes for ESE paras?

The Personnel Department reports that the absentee rate for ESE paras is not recorded this year on the SEMS program as the ESE teachers are. Beginning in 2003-04, this information will be recorded. At the present, each individual school calls in substitute paraprofessionals.

 

14. Polk’s In-School and Out-of-School Suspension Rate:

In Polk County in 2000-2001, 10 percent of the students were placed on in-school suspension, and 16 percent of the students were placed on out-of-school suspension. Of the 13 largest school districts in Florida, only two districts in 2000-2001 had higher rates of out-of-school suspensions, Brevard at 16.2%, and Duval at 21.4%.  What is the rate of in-school and out-of-school suspensions for Polk's ESE students?  For many of the ESE students it is not appropriate to give them out-of-school suspensions.  Are ESE personnel making the decisions?

Go to the 2004 Data Indicators tab, click, and look at page 6.  Statewide in 2002-2003, 8% of the total student population received in-school suspensions, 9% in Polk County.  However, statewide, 14% of the  students with disabilities received out-of-school suspensions, 23% in Polk County.  Polk was 64% higher.   Statewide in 2003-2004, 7% of the total student population received out-of-school suspensions, 11% in Polk County.  However, statewide, 15% of the  students with disabilities received out-of-school suspensions, 20% in Polk County.  Polk is 33% higher.

Suspensions are issued by school based administrators and or meetings involved with the Office of Discipline. Rates in our District are unusually high for both ESE and regular education students.  ESE teachers are involved as per IDEA including the manifestation determination, functional behavior assessments and behavior intervention plans.    Training on IDEA compliance items involving suspension is provided on a regular basis.  The District is also piloting a Positive Behavioral Supports training to assist schools and help them arrive at alternatives for suspension.

 

15.  The Incident of Battery in the Polk County School System:

The SESIR Incident Summaries on MyFloridaEducation.Com show that of the 13 largest school systems in the state, the Polk County School System reported the highest incidence of batteries, 11.76 batteries per 1,000 students.  The next highest was Palm Beach with 8.02 per 1,000, then Lee with 5.73 per 1,000, Dade at 5.15 per 1,000, Hillsborough at 4.72 per 1,000, Duval at 4.03 per 1,000… How many of these batteries involved ESE students, and how many of these batteries were a manifestation of the ESE students disability?

According to information from the Student Services Department, discipline information is entered on to the mainframe with no differentiation between ESE students and regular education students. This issue will also be one of the issues addressed by the SEDNET committee. 

Polk County does not keep records on how many ESE students are charged with batteries on Polk's school campuses.  I tried to get them to start keeping such records.  ESE students are not only being charged, but they are being arrested and taken to the Juvenile Detention Center for behaviors that are a manifestation of their disabilities.   At the Juvenile Detention Center, they are unable to accommodate the disabilities of the ESE students. 

I have seen no movement to change the system that allows, and perhaps encourages this to happen.  On April 27th, 2004 I received a letter from Ann Marshall in the Director of Discipline and Security, Polk County Schools, saying "Consideration will be given to developing a system relating to student arrest rates at a later date."  It took two years to get this non-response.

 Click here to get a copy of an April 27th, 2004, letter from Ann Marshall.

 

16. Beginning of Year Delay in Providing Services:

From experience, delivery of most services like speech and physical therapy does not begin until the third week of the school year, even for returning students. Is this a scheduling problem or a budget problem? For many of the ESE students, the loss of these services over the summer is damaging enough. Why is it necessary to add another two weeks to the absence of services?

DOE Technical Assistance Paper # 11149

How can a therapist accommodate for the beginning of year procedures without using a range of time?

District procedures must ensure that students who have a therapy documented on the IEP receive therapy on a regularly scheduled basis at the beginning of each school year but with no more than a 10-day delay.  More than 10 days may be interpreted as a change of placement and a denial of a free appropriate public education (FAPE).

As referenced in TAN FY 1991-2 “Beginning of Year Procedures for Programs for Speech and Language Impaired Students,” the Office of Civil Right (OCR) declined to state a rule as to an acceptable length of delay.  They did, however, state that a 10-day delay in initiation of direct services would not be a denial of FAPE.

 

17.  Training of Para’s

 What percentage of the ESE para-professionals in the Polk County School District received adequate training regarding the specific disability of the student they are assisting with?  What percentage of ESE para-professionals in the Polk County School District have received training regarding the specific disability of the students they are assisting?

The District (FDLRS) and the ESE facilitators provide the paraprofessionals with introductory training specifically designed to identify educational and behavioral characteristics of children with disabilities.  Paras are assigned to specific units. paraprofessionals are trained on a daily basis by the ESE teacher in the classroom to which they are assigned.  After hours training for both teachers and paraprofessionals is on a voluntary basis. School based training is may be provided to the paras by the principals and may include crisis prevention and behavior management training.

 

18. Vocational Training for the Mentally Retarded and Job Coaching:

Is staffing in this area sufficient to insure job coaching is available for our ESE students? What is the average shoulder-to-shoulder time a parent should expect when best practices are in place?  What is the average shoulder-to shoulder time Polk's job coaches are actually able to spend with their students?

There are currently five transition specialists within our district.  Job coaches are provided to each job site within the community and work to coordinate work based learning programs specific to the job site.  Students are provided individual job training by the job coaches on a daily basis as appropriate.  Students may also work side by side with site-based employees to improve skills.  Shoulder to shoulder time is contingent upon the needs of the individual student.  A daily evaluation of employability skills is monitored to assess strengths and weaknesses.  There is also an existing job program that   provides for an inclusive model at Florida Southern College.  Transition specialists work closely with schools and students to help find paid employment upon graduation.

 

19.  Instruction of Regular Ed Teachers on Inclusion

Recent experience has been that there is very little training for the majority of regular Ed teachers on the inclusion model and how to make it effective. Are there any plans to make serious inclusions training part of a regular Ed teacher's required training program in the next year or two?

An Inclusion Facilitator works full time training and supporting schools that are changing their service delivery models for students with disabilities.  At the end of this school year there will be 30 schools that are working to give students with disabilities more access to the general curriculum.  Through the use of the training model adopted by the DOE, “The Quality Designs for Instruction”, teams from these schools are trained in the inclusion philosophy, techniques and tools for making change, instructional strategies that work for all kids, accommodations and modifications, and collaborative teaching.  This is a 3-day comprehensive training.  The team develops an action plan for their individual schools, that will consist of more customized training for their staff.  In addition to this, ESE is now networking with HRD to imbed more instructional strategies that are inclusion friendly into the required FLIGHT training for new teachers.  In addition, we are working with local colleges to emphasize the importance of pre-service changing to better prepare prospective new teachers for inclusive education.

Over $30,000 has been spent this school year from ESE on training specifically geared to inclusive practices.  A substantial grant is expected from DOE to further support these efforts for next year.  Effort will be made to continue to create a seamless system for training that will not focus on inclusion training, as much as it will focus on quality instruction in the classroom or all students. 

 

20.  Parent Involvement in the Committee and in Their Child’s Education:

Providing parents meaningful information in a format that illustrates important impacts on their child’s education would be the fastest way to increase parent involvement in the committee and their child’s education.  Can this committee assemble the information and post it on your web page?

For specific information sources, the PCSB website can provide links to information and sites.

 

 

This information has been posted by Bill Sammons, a parent of an ESE student in the Polk County School District in Florida.
Contact:
Bill@ESEparents.org

(863) 688-3323